The District One Public Works Integrating Committee (DOPWIC) and its Small Government Subcommittee met on January 28, 2025. They adopted the project scores for the State Infrastructure Programs with no changes, and scores for the Small Government projects with one change at the recommendation of program staff.

Fiscal Year 2026 Final Ranking and Recommendations

RankApplicantProject
Name
Recommended
Funding
Type
LTIP
Grant
SCIP
Grant
RLP
1Olmsted TownshipFitch Road Sanitary Extension and Roadway ImprovementSCIP Grant$0$3,745,343$0
2County Department of Public WorksLee Road Bridge 00.77 RehabilitationLTIP Grant$0$383,988$0
3Garfield HeightsE. 126th St. Sewer Separation ExtensionSCIP Grant$0$669,058$0
4Garfield HeightsMulti-Street Reconstruction – Phase 9SCIP Grant$0$1,544,650$0
5ParmaN. and W. Linden Lane Septic Abatement Project Ph. 1SCIP Grant-Loan Combo$0$600,000$400,000
6Newburgh HeightsEast 42nd Street and Beta Avenue ReconstructionSCIP Grant$0$499,999$0
7ClevelandCarnegie Avenue – Phase 3SCIP Grant$0$7,475,020$0
8County Department of Public WorksWarrensville Center Road ImprovementLTIP Grant$0$1,812,147$0
9LakewoodCUY-Bunts Rd RehabilitationLTIP Grant$2,100,000$0$0
10Maple HeightsSouthwest Sewer Improvement Phase 3SCIP Grant$0$298,290$0
10Pepper PikeSouthwest Quadrant Septic Conversion Project PY29RLP Loan$0$0$459,795
12County Department of Public WorksRidgewood Drive Bridge 03.50 ReplacementLTIP Grant$0$852,746$0
12Rocky RiverBeachcliff / Cornwall Improvement ProjectRLP Loan$0$0$2,223,300
14ParmaW. 54th Street Sewer Improvement Project Ph. ISCIP Grant-Loan Combo$0$400,000$600,000
15Shaker HeightsLee Road Complete StreetSCIP Grant$4,882,253$0$0
16Newburgh HeightsGamma Avenue Water MainSCIP Grant$0$147,079$0
17LakewoodCSO-052 Storage FacilityContingency$0$0$0
18North OlmstedLorain Avenue Resurfacing ProjectContingency$0$0$0
19BrecksvilleHighland Drive and Sentinel Drive Culvert Replacement ProjectContingency$0$0$0
20Warrensville HeightsOld Emery Road CulvertContingency$0$0$0
21Chagrin Falls VillageMaple Street Phase 2 ImprovementsContingency$0$0$0
22GlenwillowPettibone Road Reconstruction Cochran – Diamond PkwyContingency$0$0$0
23SolonMiles Road Waterline ReplacementContingency$0$0$0
24StrongsvilleAlbion Road and Prospect Road Intersection Improvement ProjectContingency$0$0$0
25Oakwood VillageTryon Road Phase 2 ResurfacingContingency$0$0$0
26BedfordSolon Road ReconstructionContingency$0$0$0
27Brooklyn HeightsValley Belt Road Reconstruction ProjectContingency$0$0$0
28Olmsted FallsColumbia Road Reconstruction PY39Contingency$0$0$0
29Gates MillsChagrin Valley Hunt Club Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) ConversionContingency$0$0$0
30Chagrin Falls VillageChagrin Falls Downtown ResurfacingContingency$0$0$0
31Richmond HeightsWaterline – Pavement ReplacementContingency$0$0$0
32Walton HillsRyan Drive and Ceile Circle Pavement Rehabilitation PY39Contingency$0$0$0
33Hunting ValleyFairmount Boulevard ReconstructionContingency$0$0$0
34Mayfield VillageBeta Drive rehabilitationContingency$0$0$0

There are three types of funds active for the FY 2026 cycle. Local Transportation Improvement Program (LTIP) grant funds can only be assigned to Road/Bridge/Culvert projects. State Capital Improvement Program (SCIP) grant funds can be assigned to all project types. Revolving Loan Program (RLP) funds can be assigned to all project types, as stand-alone funding, or in combination with grant funds.

There is no longer a requirement for SCIP loan funds. The DOPWIC decided to forego SCIP loan funds until a time when the year-over-year loan balance warrants restarting this program. Hence, this column is zeroed out for this cycle.

In order to optimize funds allocated to the highest scoring projects, some fund assignments have been shifted between LTIP and SCIP balances since the preliminary recommendations were posted in December 2024. This ensures that no project, because of project type, is skipped over for lack of assignable funding for that project type. This has resulted in a slight change from the original posting of funds allocated.

Funded projects are those above the red cutoff lines. Because the LTIP and SCIP grant programs have different amounts available, there are two red cutoff lines – one for LTIP funds and a different for SCIP funds. The last projects above the line in each category are currently only partially funded.

The RLP fund has a positive balance. Once OPWC confirms the DOPWIC funding recommendations, OPWC will start offering loans, in rank order, to partially and unfunded projects until the loan fund balance is depleted.

Fiscal Year 2026 Small Government Final Ranking and Recommendations

The DOPWIC can submit only five Small Government projects for OPWC funding. The score for the Ability & Effort criterion cannot be determined in this stage of the process, so OPWC provides a proxy value for the Small Government Committee to use. Adding these proxy scores, as well as the District Priority Ranking scores, are the only changes since the December posting. The projects above the red line will be submitted to OPWC for funding.